It is becoming increasingly apparent to the IGA that a lack of clear global guidelines and standards is holding back the assessment of geothermal energy as a viable energy option at a global scale. A proper comparison of different energy options in different locations requires globally consistent methods for assessing and classifying energy potential. A global assessment of geothermal potential, however, is hindered on at least two fronts. Firstly, national agencies in many parts of the world have no experience or guidelines as to how to assess, quantify and classify their local geothermal potential. Secondly, those agencies that have assessed geothermal potential within their jurisdictions have developed and used their own local methodologies and terminologies that are not necessarily comparable with other jurisdictions.
The IGA convened a workshop on 14 November 2013 in Essen, Germany, to mobilize its membership (representing the global geothermal sector) to address two relevant issues:
The program was divided into morning and afternoon sessions. The general format of both sessions was a series of short invited presentations followed by open discussion and debate. The presentations can be downloaded following the links below.
Examples of existing schemes used around the world for assessing and classifying geothermal potential in terms of technical feasibility, economic viability and level of confidence, and an introduction to the UNFC-2009 classification scheme for Renewables.
Introduction Graeme Beardsmore; IGA, Australia | 2.03 MB | Download |
USA: current status Paul Brophy; EGS Inc, USA | 4.27 MB | Download |
East Africa: current status Peter Omenda; GDC, Kenya | 10.48 MB | Download |
Indonesia: current status Suryantini; INAGA/API, Indonesia | 1.2 MB | Download |
Japan: current status Kasumi Yasukawa; AIST, Japan | 6.46 MB | Download |
AGEA/CanGEA Reporting Codes Jim Lawless; IGA, New Zealand | 288.11 KB | Download |
Defining "Geothermal Potential" Ladislaus Rybach; ETH Zurich, Switzerland | 3.3 MB | Download |
UNFC-2009 Scheme Gioia Falcone; TU Clausthal, Germany | 1.07 MB | Download |
Case studies of different geological settings prospective for geothermal systems.
Geothermal Plays in Geologic Settings Inga Moeck; Univ. of Alberta, Canada | 3.07 MB | Download |
Convective, Convergent Margins Plays Jim Lawless; IGA, New Zealand | 2.24 MB | Download |
Convective, Divergent Margins Plays Benedikt Steingrimsson; ISOR, Iceland | 5.84 MB | Download |
Convective, Intrusive, Extensional Plays Luis Gutiérrez-Negrín; Geothermal Assoc., Mexico | 4.03 MB | Download |
Convective, Intrusive, Convergent Plays Adele Manzella; CNR-IGG, Italy | 8.6 MB | Download |
Convective, Non-Magmatic Plays Inga Moeck; Univ. of Alberta, Canada | 4.2 MB | Download |
Conductive, Intracratonic Plays Miklos Antics; GPC-IP, France | 7.15 MB | Download |
Conductive, Orogenic Plays Steve Grasby; NR Canada | 14.35 MB | Download |
Conductive, Basement Plays Graeme Beardsmore; IGA, Australia | 5.37 MB | Download |